So I believe you suggested that we write a blog responding to the writings by Matt Townsley and Walter Bouzard. I had forgotten until now, so here it is. Better late than never!
Not knowing Townsley or his personality, when I first read his article over whether Wartburg is really a college of the church, I couldn't help but wonder if he was playing devil's advocate to an extent. I found myself wondering if this is how he really felt, or if he was pulling together facts to make the school think about and remember what they represent. I didn't feel like the information he presented was consistently used in the correct context. I think he pulled bits and pieces to make his point. While I agree that the college is very tolerant of other religions, I do not think this is a bad thing. Everyone has a different background and something different to bring to the table. As Christians, I feel we should recognize that everyone has a right to worship if they so choose. I like how everyone is welcomed to Communion, even if they are not Lutheran. Jesus did die for everyone after all.
I do not think that Townsley was expecting a response to his argument, but he did. Bouzard's response to Townsley's argument was better organized and had definite proof that backed up his different points. I thought it was funny at the end that he mentioned how Townsley unintentionally argued for more religion classes. I don't think that was Townsley's intent!
I found these two pieces interesting. I am perfectly content with the way Wartburg is currently running as far as religion goes. There are plenty of opportunities to get involved in religion here. I like how they are not forced opportunities either. I feel like if I was forced to be involved in a religious group or forced to attend a certain amount of services, that I would enjoy it less, simply because I was told I have to. I think that Townsley made some interesting points in his article, however he was no match for Bouzard's response.
No comments:
Post a Comment